Muslims Under Progress...

progress: n.
a. movement, as toward a goal; advance.
b. development or growth.
c. steady improvement, as of a society or civilization.
progress: intr.v.
pro·gressed, pro·gress·ing,
pro·gress·es
a. to advance toward a higher or better stage.










Links:

Suffice to say I do not endorse all the links here, whether they are 'friendly', 'hostile' or 'indifferent'. They do, however, give some 'food for thought' - I hope!

Opinions
alt.muslim
A True Word
Balkinization
Bin Gregory
Amir Butler
Dear Raed
The Islamist
Ideofact
Latif's Cavern
NESSIA
Muslim Pundit
Muslim Wake Up!
Path of the Paddle
Procrastination
Shi'a Pundit
veiled4allah
Secular Islam


Islamic thought
Contemporary
Iqbal Academy Pakistan
The Alternative Way
Free Minds
Liberal Islam
Renaissance
Understanding Islam

Traditional/Classical
The Fiqh
Living Islam
Masud
Zaytuna Institute

Shi'a Islam
Al-Islam
IIS

Political
IIPT
Islam21
S. Parvez Mansoor
Minaret of Freedom Institute

Philosophy
Critical Discourse
Kalam
Philosophia Islamica

Resources
Hadith Database Online
Qur'an Database Online

A little bit of everything
Bartleby Encyclopedia
Islamic Awareness
ISIM
Muslim Heritage
openDemocracy
The Secular Web
Virtually Islamic






Thursday, July 31, 2003

 

Update

I type from Granada, Andalucia, Southern Spain. I have been off these past few days on holiday, following the historical sites around the region. Insha´Allah, next week I will write a little bit about what I have learnt, as well a few notes on various topics. The weather, as is expected, is very sunny and very hot (Granada is 38 degrees Celcius, and Cordoba was 43 degrees Celcius!).


:: this was posted by thabet at 14:50

Thursday, July 03, 2003

 

Natural law and 'Islamic' governance

I don't agree with the 'Qur'an-only' movement, mainly because of the lack of appreciation of Muslim history (not that they are 'ignorant' of it; but they seem to merely dismiss it as an aberration, which seems a little far-fetched), and their strange instance that the Prophet (p), a man whose life was intertwined with the Qur'an, was merely a postman who delivered the mail. Indeed, a 'Qur'an-only' Muslim is likely to dismiss me as a (quote) 'Sunni, idol-worshipping, disbeliever' (yes, some I have met do hold these views; though I it is highly unlikely that my views will fall in line with the catholicism of 'Sunni Islam' proper).

But nonetheless, this article on "The Natural Republic", from Free Minds, a 'Qur'an-only' website, is an interesting one.

The basic gist of their argument is that a government, whsoe principles are drawn from the Qur'an, will base it on "natural, permanent laws" which have been created by God and revealed to us in the Qur'an. I assume that if God created these 'natural laws', then as a corollary, reason must also play a role in formulating a government, but where reason is guided by revelation.

They lay out 15 principles, which ought to be the basis for any 'Islamic' government. Principle XI is "Religious Freedom":

"In secular governments there is a wall of separation between state and church (i.e. organized religious clergy). The Quran goes even further by establishing that each individual is solely responsible for his or her own beliefs and salvation and there is absolutely no role for a church. Each individual’s mind is his or her church and there is no concept of a hierarchical organized religious institution in the Quran."

(This reminds me: I have been meaning to post a little something on 'secularism' and Islam). The main problem here seems to be a naive view of the word 'secular' and all the connotations that secularism as ideology brings. Certainly, religious freedom, freedom of mind and the freedom to think, are concepts any government must all uphold. But it is 'secularism' as 'truth', which is the complete antithesis of religion, and Islam in particular, which causes the clash. To merely posit the idea that 'secular' governments 'seperate church from state' is to overlook a great many issues. That the secular state has invaded more of our private and family lives (the 'nanny-state', social security, etc.), is often not considered. Secularism must, in its conclusion, wallow around in its immanence, phoney objectivity, crass glorification of man and its inability to realise that it is nothing more than a superficial variety of religion - a religion, stripped of the Transcendent, and made completely immanent. Opposed to this view is, of course, religion, and Islam in particular, which is about nothing but the Transcendent and its relationship with the mundane. But enough of this. I shall, insha'Allah, post a bit more with special attention to Muslim criticism of the 'secular truth' in due course.

I have been reading through, among other books, A. Ezatti's Islam and Natural Law, and there are some point s which correspond to this article. Insha'Allah, I will post on them too in due course.


:: this was posted by thabet at 17:12

 

Humour

This whole site is hilarious. Highlights include condemnation of the missionary position, the solution to women's rights and how to overcome problems with urniation.

(Via Path of the Paddle.)


:: this was posted by thabet at 15:49

Wednesday, July 02, 2003

 

Islam, Women and Rights

Sister al-Muhajabah posts on the situation in Saudi Arabia with respect to "women's rights", and how women there are demanding some positive change. A quote from the article:

"Rights are not given. We have to ask for them," computer programmer Alia Banaja said on the two-hour program."

"We are handicapped in terms of personal freedom. We even need permission from a male guardian to get our identification papers, pediatrician Suad Jaber said on the program, "Saudi Women Speak Out.""


I wrote this in her comments section. I have reproduced it here, with some additions and minor changes for clarification.

In relation to Saudi, it is to be noted that change for the better will only come from within. The idea being pushed around today, especially some of our more "gung-ho" neighbours on this planet who live across the pond from the UK, that 'liberalism' (I use the word here tentatively, because an association is always made between 'liberalism' and certain political or ideological groups and causes) can be imposed from without is ludicrous. It is doomed to fail. Euope overcame religious and social intolerance from within. The same must really occur in Saudi, Iran, Afghanistan and so on. The whip, pistol and boots of the totalitarian regimes in our lands must not be replaced by the same artefacts of oppression, with the only change being the insignias. We've been there already, lest we forget history.

There is a very easy solution, in my humble opinion, to the "Women's rights" issue in Islamic countries and within Islam in general.

Simply give women the right, or even push for them, to train up to the the level of highly-qualified `ulema. There is a tendency to restrict women's education in modern Islam to the Qur'an (with a commentry of course - don't want to give them dangerous ideas of interpretation now do we!), some Ahadith (again with comments) and a few essentials of Fiqh (e.g. housekeeping, family-relationships etc.). The restriction on, for example, women judges seems simply a by-product of the societies which have traditionally housed Islamic culture.

It is better to ground them in the vast corpus of Islamic literature (for unlike, say Christianity, Islamic literature is a lot more in-depth simply because of the nature of the two dogmas), including the speculative legal theories and the massive amount of work in the moral-ethical field. Then simply let them excercise creativity in expressing their knowledge. Being Muslims, their efforts will, insha'Allah, be in correspondence with the "spirit of Islam".

Allowing this sort of moral-intellectual endeavour from Muslim women would also test the limits of the common (Muslim) notion of "women and Islam" I see trotted out by men (always men!) everywhere, from the TV to collections of fatawa to those pink pamphlets handed outside a mosque or on a da'wah table (you know the sort; they are always entitled "Women and Islam - The Truth" or "Women - More Secure in Islam". I should add that the title header of this post bears an uncanny resemblance to a leaflet I once saw!).

This would rebutt the, often condescending and hypocritical, prattle from the secular humanist male `ulema in the 'West' - as well helping them to assert themselves in their own communities. Don't forget these efforts would not be lost - not only do we hope that God grants them blessings in the Next Life for their efforts, but in this world their efforts would be fruitful. For women are the Ummah - they are one-half of it and give birth to the other half. And education, not just 'intellectual', but moral and ethical instruction (that is education as a life process) always begins and ends in the home.

The irony of this effort would be that the ones to defend the 'old-fashioned' outlook (though who am I to say that women do not feel comfortable with "old-fashioned"?) would probably be women.

But God knows best!


:: this was posted by thabet at 17:36

 

Powered By Blogger TM